<div> - What is The Meaning of

<h2 id=”popularity” name=”popularity”>Daja Name Popularity</h2>
<p>
How popular is the name Daja? Here’s everything we know about the name **Daja**.
</p>

<div>
<div id=”data”>
<p>
The name Daja has a relatively unique and interesting history regarding its popularity in the United States. Examining data from the Social Security Administration (SSA), we can track its usage over the past century. From 1910 through 1990, the name **Daja** saw virtually no recorded births in the SSA database, indicating it was an extremely rare choice during this period.
</p>

<table id=”name-birth-data-table” readabilitydatatable=”1″>
<thead>
<tr>
<th scope=”col”>Year</th>
<th scope=”col”>Rank</th>
<th scope=”col”># Births</th>
<th scope=”col”>% Births</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1910</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1911</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1912</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1913</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1914</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1915</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1916</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1917</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1918</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1919</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1920</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1921</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1922</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1923</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1924</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1925</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1926</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1927</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1928</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1929</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1930</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1931</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1932</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1933</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1934</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1935</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1936</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1937</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1938</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1939</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1940</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1941</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1942</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1943</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1944</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1945</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1946</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1947</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1948</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1949</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1950</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1951</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1952</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1953</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1954</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1955</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1956</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1957</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1958</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1959</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1960</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1961</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1962</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1963</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1964</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1965</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1966</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1967</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1968</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1969</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1970</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1971</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1972</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1973</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1974</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1975</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1976</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1977</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1978</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1979</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1980</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1981</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1982</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1983</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1984</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1985</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1986</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1987</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1988</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1989</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1990</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1991</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0.0004%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1992</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1993</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1994</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>17</td>
<td>0.0011%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1995</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>166</td>
<td>0.011%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1996</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>202</td>
<td>0.0135%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1997</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>155</td>
<td>0.0105%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1998</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>170</td>
<td>0.0114%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>1999</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>159</td>
<td>0.0106%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2000</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>142</td>
<td>0.0093%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2001</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>88</td>
<td>0.0058%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2002</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>74</td>
<td>0.0049%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2003</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>69</td>
<td>0.0045%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2004</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>0.0015%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2005</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>34</td>
<td>0.0022%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2006</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>0.0008%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2007</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>26</td>
<td>0.0016%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2008</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2009</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>0.0003%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2010</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>0.0003%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2011</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2012</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2013</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2014</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2015</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2016</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2017</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2018</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2019</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2020</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2021</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2022</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope=”row”>2023</th>
<td>—</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>0%</td>
</tr>

</tbody>
</table>

<p>
The turning point came in 1991 when 7 births were recorded with the name **Daja**, marking its initial entry into the SSA records. A slight increase occurred in 1994 with 17 births. However, the name’s popularity peaked between 1995 and 2000. In 1995, 166 babies were named Daja, followed by 202 in 1996, representing its most popular year. The numbers then gradually declined, with 155, 170, 159, and 142 births respectively in the subsequent years.
</p>

<p>
From 2001 onwards, the name’s usage decreased significantly. The number of births ranged from a high of 88 in 2001 to sporadic single-digit occurrences in the late 2000s and early 2010s. Since 2011, the name Daja has seen very little to no usage, with zero births recorded in most years, suggesting it has become a relatively uncommon name choice in recent times.
</p>

<p>
The data from the District of Columbia shows very limited use of the name Daja, with only sporadic instances recorded. This mirrors the overall trend of the name’s limited popularity across the entire United States, indicating it has not been a widely adopted name in any specific region.
</p>
</div>

<div id=”state”>
<canvas id=”state-chart-dc” width=”160″ height=”40″ data-locality=”US_DC”
data-chart_values=”[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5, 0, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]”
data-chart_labels='[“1910”, “1911”, “1912”, “1913”, “1914”, “1915”, “1916”, “1917”, “1918”, “1919”, “1920”, “1921”, “1922”, “1923”, “1924”, “1925”, “1926”, “1927”, “1928”, “1929”, “1930”, “1931”, “1932”, “1933”, “1934”, “1935”, “1936”, “1937”, “1938”, “1939”, “1940”, “1941”, “1942”, “1943”, “1944”, “1945”, “1946”, “1947”, “1948”, “1949”, “1950”, “1951”, “1952”, “1953”, “1954”, “1955”, “1956”, “1957”, “1958”, “1959”, “1960”, “1961”, “1962”, “1963”, “1964”, “1965”, “1966”, “1967”, “1968”, “1969”, “1970”, “1971”, “1972”, “1973”, “1974”, “1975”, “1976”, “1977”, “1978”, “1979”, “1980”, “1981”, “1982”, “1983”, “1984”, “1985”, “1986”, “1987”, “1988”, “1989”, “1990”, “1991”, “1992”, “1993”, “1994”, “1995”, “1996”, “1997”, “1998”, “1999”, “2000”, “2001”, “2002”, “2003”, “2004”, “2005”, “2006”, “2007”, “2008”, “2009”, “2010”, “2011”, “2012”, “2013”, “2014”, “2015”, “2016”, “2017”, “2018”, “2019”, “2020”, “2021”, “2022”, “2023”]’
data-chart_color=”rgba(235, 39, 156, 0.5)”>
</canvas>
<p><small>District of Columbia <small>(DC)</small></small></p>
</div>
</div>

<hr>

<h2 id=”meaning”>Meaning and Origins of Daja</h2>

<p>
While precise etymological origins of the name Daja are somewhat elusive, it is often considered a modern or invented name, potentially drawing inspiration from various cultural influences. Its sound aligns with names found in Slavic or Eastern European regions, although concrete historical links are not definitively established. This ambiguity contributes to its unique and contemporary appeal.
</p>

<p>
Some theories propose that **Daja** could be a diminutive of names like Dajana or a creative variation of similar-sounding names. In some interpretations, the name is associated with qualities such as “brightness,” “radiance,” or “divine grace,” although these are largely speculative and lack direct linguistic evidence. The beauty of a less common name like Daja lies in the individual interpretation and the personal significance it holds for the parents and the child.
</p>

Share this:

Related posts:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply