The name Davis is a classic choice with a rich history and enduring appeal. But how popular is the name Davis? Let’s delve into its origins, popularity trends, and explore similar names that might capture your interest.
(Image of a baby boy with the name Davis displayed)
Davis Name Popularity
Here’s a detailed look at the popularity of the name Davis over the years, based on data from the Social Security Administration (SSA).
| Year | Rank | # Births | % Births |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1910 | 435 | 12 | 0.0034% |
| 1911 | 668 | 5 | 0.0013% |
| 1912 | 589 | 19 | 0.0038% |
| 1913 | 589 | 25 | 0.0044% |
| 1914 | 579 | 39 | 0.0056% |
| 1915 | 540 | 73 | 0.008% |
| 1916 | 525 | 81 | 0.0084% |
| 1917 | 512 | 91 | 0.0091% |
| 1918 | 495 | 108 | 0.0101% |
| 1919 | 481 | 114 | 0.0109% |
| 1920 | 588 | 74 | 0.0067% |
| 1921 | 501 | 116 | 0.0101% |
| 1922 | 529 | 103 | 0.0092% |
| 1923 | 570 | 84 | 0.0075% |
| 1924 | 461 | 140 | 0.0121% |
| 1925 | 504 | 110 | 0.0097% |
| 1926 | 543 | 90 | 0.0082% |
| 1927 | 514 | 105 | 0.0095% |
| 1928 | 532 | 93 | 0.0087% |
| 1929 | 561 | 76 | 0.0073% |
| 1930 | 587 | 70 | 0.0067% |
| 1931 | 562 | 73 | 0.0074% |
| 1932 | 538 | 79 | 0.008% |
| 1933 | 593 | 59 | 0.0063% |
| 1934 | 561 | 76 | 0.0079% |
| 1935 | 588 | 62 | 0.0064% |
| 1936 | 542 | 75 | 0.0078% |
| 1937 | 585 | 63 | 0.0064% |
| 1938 | 573 | 69 | 0.0067% |
| 1939 | 575 | 67 | 0.0066% |
| 1940 | 555 | 76 | 0.0072% |
| 1941 | 597 | 63 | 0.0056% |
| 1942 | 619 | 66 | 0.0052% |
| 1943 | 558 | 84 | 0.0064% |
| 1944 | 652 | 51 | 0.0041% |
| 1945 | 550 | 78 | 0.0064% |
| 1946 | 567 | 88 | 0.006% |
| 1947 | 604 | 88 | 0.0053% |
| 1948 | 540 | 109 | 0.0068% |
| 1949 | 559 | 105 | 0.0065% |
| 1950 | 635 | 74 | 0.0046% |
| 1951 | 590 | 93 | 0.0055% |
| 1952 | 608 | 86 | 0.0049% |
| 1953 | 700 | 64 | 0.0036% |
| 1954 | 614 | 99 | 0.0054% |
| 1955 | 651 | 86 | 0.0047% |
| 1956 | 658 | 88 | 0.0047% |
| 1957 | 699 | 72 | 0.0037% |
| 1958 | 648 | 94 | 0.005% |
| 1959 | 640 | 102 | 0.0054% |
| 1960 | 695 | 80 | 0.0042% |
| 1961 | 652 | 95 | 0.005% |
| 1962 | 757 | 61 | 0.0033% |
| 1963 | 713 | 73 | 0.0041% |
| 1964 | 771 | 56 | 0.0032% |
| 1965 | 669 | 78 | 0.0048% |
| 1966 | 716 | 63 | 0.004% |
| 1967 | 694 | 72 | 0.0047% |
| 1968 | 787 | 47 | 0.0031% |
| 1969 | 803 | 50 | 0.0032% |
| 1970 | 747 | 75 | 0.0047% |
| 1971 | 783 | 63 | 0.0042% |
| 1972 | 761 | 64 | 0.0047% |
| 1973 | 841 | 48 | 0.0037% |
| 1974 | 1074 | 23 | 0.0018% |
| 1975 | 881 | 47 | 0.0037% |
| 1976 | 868 | 49 | 0.0038% |
| 1977 | 847 | 58 | 0.0043% |
| 1978 | 797 | 71 | 0.0053% |
| 1979 | 782 | 77 | 0.0055% |
| 1980 | 776 | 80 | 0.0055% |
| 1981 | 704 | 101 | 0.0069% |
| 1982 | 677 | 114 | 0.0076% |
| 1983 | 685 | 105 | 0.0071% |
| 1984 | 644 | 128 | 0.0086% |
| 1985 | 659 | 126 | 0.0083% |
| 1986 | 581 | 190 | 0.0126% |
| 1987 | 580 | 201 | 0.0132% |
| 1988 | 580 | 210 | 0.0135% |
| 1989 | 577 | 238 | 0.0147% |
| 1990 | 613 | 226 | 0.0136% |
| 1991 | 594 | 250 | 0.0153% |
| 1992 | 507 | 353 | 0.0221% |
| 1993 | 461 | 420 | 0.0269% |
| 1994 | 413 | 513 | 0.0334% |
| 1995 | 417 | 505 | 0.0335% |
| 1996 | 409 | 531 | 0.0355% |
| 1997 | 373 | 619 | 0.0419% |
| 1998 | 375 | 641 | 0.0428% |
| 1999 | 366 | 680 | 0.0454% |
| 2000 | 380 | 650 | 0.0425% |
| 2001 | 359 | 707 | 0.0469% |
| 2002 | 393 | 629 | 0.042% |
| 2003 | 370 | 672 | 0.0442% |
| 2004 | 375 | 705 | 0.0463% |
| 2005 | 389 | 707 | 0.0462% |
| 2006 | 404 | 704 | 0.045% |
| 2007 | 394 | 733 | 0.0465% |
| 2008 | 407 | 694 | 0.0449% |
| 2009 | 423 | 634 | 0.0424% |
| 2010 | 417 | 631 | 0.0438% |
| 2011 | 433 | 590 | 0.0414% |
| 2012 | 412 | 659 | 0.0462% |
| 2013 | 438 | 616 | 0.0433% |
| 2014 | 440 | 636 | 0.0437% |
| 2015 | 469 | 591 | 0.0406% |
| 2016 | 480 | 588 | 0.0408% |
| 2017 | 481 | 557 | 0.0399% |
| 2018 | 493 | 529 | 0.0385% |
| 2019 | 522 | 491 | 0.0363% |
| 2020 | 550 | 462 | 0.0363% |
| 2021 | 549 | 487 | 0.0398% |
| 2022 | 640 | 390 | 0.0296% |
| 2023 | 603 | 428 | 0.0331% |
Data via SSA.gov
The data reveals a fascinating story. While its popularity fluctuated throughout the 20th century, Davis has seen a resurgence in recent decades. It consistently ranks within the top 650 names, indicating a solid and steady presence. The highest number of births recorded with the name Davis, within the provided dataset, occurred in 2001 with 707 births.
Interestingly, the District of Columbia has shown some usage of the name Davis, though at very low numbers.
Meaning and Origin of Davis
Davis is a surname-turned-first name of Welsh origin. It directly translates to "son of David." The name David itself is Hebrew, meaning "beloved." Therefore, Davis carries the connotation of being the "son of the beloved." This simple yet profound meaning contributes to its timeless appeal. The name is associated with strength, heritage, and a sense of connection to family.
Names Like Davis
If you are drawn to the sound and style of Davis, consider these similar names:
Variants of Davis:
- Dave: A short and friendly diminutive of David, meaning "beloved."
- Davidson: Meaning "son of David," similar to Davis.
- Davies: Another variation meaning "son of David."
- Davison: English origin, meaning "son of David."
- Daviss: English origin, meaning "son of David."
- Davy: A charming and classic variation of David.
- Dayson: English origin, meaning "son of David."
- Dayton: Meaning "Day’s settlement" or "David’s settlement."
Names that Sound Like Davis:
- Tavis: Of Irish origin.
- Tevis: Of Irish origin.
Siblings of Davis
Parents who choose the name Davis often select these names for siblings:
- Lincoln: Meaning "lake colony" of English origin.
Conclusion
The name Davis boasts a blend of classic charm and modern appeal. Its strong meaning, coupled with its steady popularity, makes it a solid choice for parents seeking a name that is both timeless and relevant. Whether you’re drawn to its Welsh roots, its connection to the beloved David, or simply its pleasant sound, Davis is a name worthy of consideration.